Comments on: An unsurprisingly disingenuous look at “marijuana”

By: mulletator

mulletator — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:15:10 +0000

Great post! All this study proves is that rat’s brains are affected by this synthetic drug. It has nothing to do with humans and marijuana.

By: Neurofreak

Neurofreak — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:18:01 +0000

Got the RSS feed fixed! It was a terror to do, but it’s done.

By: h3

h3 — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:08:06 +0000

> At what point does over-simplification become deception and misdirection?

It depends, scientifically or politically ? As far as I know, the latter has no boundaries.

By: dave

dave — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:16:19 +0000

Hello
Came over from Reddit — I tried to subscribe to your feed, but it seems to have been taken over by a spambot of some sort? You may wish to have that checked out. I’d love to subscribe soon, hope you can fix it. Till then I’ll bookmark

By: Neurofreak

Neurofreak — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:17:03 +0000

Thank you, Gnotsie! Both for the correction and the kind words!

By: Gnotsie

Gnotsie — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:25:22 +0000

I think you mean “who”, not “whom” in the first paragraph. Who refers to the subject of a sentence, while whom refers to an object.

Otherwise, very well constructed criticism of a very shady article.